{"id":326,"date":"2012-09-23T03:16:40","date_gmt":"2012-09-23T03:16:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.mtls.ca\/issue14\/?page_id=326"},"modified":"2026-05-28T20:31:49","modified_gmt":"2026-05-28T20:31:49","slug":"art","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.mtls.ca\/issue14\/art\/","title":{"rendered":"Art: Daniel Richards"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>Illuminating our World, One Canvas at a Time<\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #888888\"><em>(Amatoritsero Ede in conversation with Daniel Richards, Illuminist and Three Dimentionalist)<\/em><\/span><\/p>\nngg_shortcode_0_placeholder\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Amatoritsero Ede:<\/strong> It is a real pleasure and an honour to have you with us on MTLS.\u00a0 The Illuminist, as an aesthete, is not a totally new figure in visual arts as you suggest in your essay, \u201cArt and the Modern Illuminist.\u201d What are the differences between the old school and a \u2018modern illuminist\u2019 like you?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Daniel Richards:<\/strong> Thank you so much for inviting me to your publication. As stated, I am a Modern Illuminist and as such exploit the same techniques as used by the classic illuminists of the past. Artists like Seurat did not have the added advantage of modern science to assist them in their endeavours to control light within their work. During the mid 1800s a movement called <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Neo-impressionism\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Neo-impressionism<\/a> evolved. Seurat was I believe one of the founding members. They believed that one should not mix their paint prior to its application to the canvas. From this came the technique known as Pointillism. They placed tiny droplets of pigment next to one another in a disciplined manner that imparted a luminous quality to their work. In those days technology did not play any roll in their process but today we have so many new tools at our disposal and far greater knowledge than ever before that allows the Modern Illuminist to push past where they left off. What the neo-impressionists had discovered was actually the first law of thermodynamics, which states that energy cannot be destroyed nor created but only transferred. By not mixing their paints before hand they were able to use raw physics to develop a visually perceived colour. When colours are placed close to one another they can have a dramatic influence on the final result. Today modern technology and techniques allow us to achieve the same effect but with extremely tiny droplets of pigment that are laid in a random manner called Stochastic Screening. Each droplet sits very close to the next and is comprised of primary colours that modulate one another as they travel through space to our retina. This does not upset the balance found in the first law of physics, as there is no actual mixing of paint or energy consumed. When paint is mixed energy is transferred and the result can be a rather dead looking colour. One of the first rules of painting is NEVER OVER MIX YOUR COLOURS. Any painter has at least once managed to mix brilliant tones of red, yellow and green into a nice dirty brown. I take complete advantage of our new knowledge afforded to me while working at the National Gallery of Canada as a senior division manager for most of my professional career. By introducing a final screening process to my artistic workflow that uses what I call Micro Pointillism, I am able to improve on what the illuminists of the past started. No colour energy is lost through mixing and my colours remain uncannily brilliant and rich not matter what their tone or shade.<\/p>\n<p><strong>A.E.:<\/strong> Are there other Canadian Artists working in this style; what keeps your work apart and gives it that \u201caesthetic arrest\u201d that hit me when I visited your Ottawa gallery, now moved unfortunately.<\/p>\n<p><strong>D.R.:<\/strong> To be more precise, technology alone and the no mixing of pigments are only part of the story. Creative play of light and shadow has as much to do with my success as does my use of technology. If this were not true then you would see this work everywhere and a lot more people would be experiencing, as you have stated, \u201caesthetic arrest\u201d more often. I have seen many take advantage of this knowledge and screening process but few in my opinion have ever been able to put enough \u2018light\u2019 in their work so as to touch the human soul with just one gaze. The only other person who I know has achieved this in my lifetime is my son, Mark Richards, who is a successful modern illuminist in Whistler BC. He puts into practice all my teaching but has moved my work into a more photographic genre, which is as, or more, effective than what I have achieved myself.<\/p>\n<p><strong>A.E.:<\/strong> In the essay I mentioned above you write: \u201cPerhaps I was an art snob because of my background and was over discriminating on medium, subject or composition.\u201d That is in reference to your \u2018Aha moment\u2019 in your growth and progression as an artist. Can you tell us more about that moment?<\/p>\n<p><strong>D.R.: <\/strong>Artists are the most critical people on the planet when it comes to their own work and when they are not easily satisfied they most often end up UNHAPPY. Yes unhappy. You see being a professional artist is not about wanting to be an artist but rather having to be. It is our destiny not our passion. Our passion is creativity and the unfortunate price that comes with this is more sleepless nights than one can imagine. Please do not take this in the wrong way but there is a huge difference between a painter and an artist. By simply going through the motions of creativity using conventional drawing techniques does not mean you are an artist. This is for your viewing public to decide, not you but if you ever wonder how close you are to achieving this status, simply look at how many happy days you have had vs. bad ones and if they outnumber happy by a significant margin, you are mostly likely at least an artist in waiting. There comes a time when failure starts to take its toll on body and mind. To suddenly and accidentally have discovered what I was looking for was a bitter-sweat moment. Clearly it was a gift but did I deserve it? I could not give myself credit for what I had just seen. It was not mine to do. As a result I finally realized my destiny and the vision I would pursue. This is something artists strive all their lives to discover and here I stood before my future. I was humbled, at that moment of self-realization, by the light in my work and by the aesthetic arrest that almost stopped my heart from beating. To this day as I look back I am humbled by what providential design ever bestowed this knowledge upon me. As my grade-6 Art Teacher once said \u2013 1% talent, 99% hard work.<\/p>\n<p><strong>A.E.:<\/strong> Is it not that the quintessential artist is always some kind of snob \u2013 even towards his own work, due to a perfectionist streak?<\/p>\n<p><strong>D.R.: <\/strong>I believe that I have answered this question to some degree in the previous answer but its the word, snob, that has caught my attention. I believe the word snob and ignorance go hand in hand. You see scholars have placed art in a rather precarious position. Some believe to appreciate and understand art you need to have achieved a specific point of knowledge or intellect. It is quite the contrary. I have people every day enter my gallery with high-brow ideas of what they think art is and if what I am doing does not adhere to their high-brow definition then it and I are SNUBBED. If it is not oil or acrylic or any of the more classic mediums many will frown on the final work. I love to tell people who only buy acrylic works that the paint is made from old margarine cartons; that both are plastic polymers of sorts:\u00a0 &lt;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Acrylic\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Acrylic<\/a>&gt;. My point is simple. Fine art is absolutely no different to music and most of us have accepted this genre in many different forms without question over our lifetime. Some may ignorantly argue that country and western music is not music but we all know it is. Personal taste and dislike and snobbery are not the same. One is based on taste, the other ignorance.<\/p>\n<p><strong>A.E.:<\/strong> How did your early years as a master print maker and photographer influence your later original work as a \u2018Modern Illuminist and 3 Dimentionalist,\u2019 with particular reference to what you have called your moment of \u201caesthetic arrest\u201d? I am assuming there are important connections there.<\/p>\n<p><strong>R.D.: <\/strong>My early years as a printmaker are at the heart of what I achieved\u00a0 but in no way limits me in my many pursuits of unique and different genres.\u00a0 The 3 Dimentionalist aspect of who I am can be seen in all of my 2D work. It is partly responsible for that \u201caesthetic arrest\u201d you have personally experienced. True 3D as we know it has been around for 150 years. One of my passions in life has been to not only continue the illuminist tradition but to also apply it in cutting edge three-dimensional art using human binocular vision as the main visual cue. Today in theatres we call it Real 3D. In my gallery you can currently experience the true future of fine art with respect to this genre. Several years ago\u00a0 I built what I believe to be the first emulation of what the true future of fine art will be and today you can see both on my wall.\u00a0I have most recently moved into the genre of the Lenticulist using the latest modern science can offer in natural three dimensional viewing. Next season it will be possible to see cutting edge 3D fine art with no mechanical aid in front of your face in my gallery. It will be as natural as normal vision. All the magic will be in the art itself. People used to ask me how I knew this. My answer was simple, \u201cWhat else would be worth pursuing?\u201d Right now you can sit in front of a contemporary looking installation comprised of two\u00a0 large images both left and right of a centred first-surface mirror. When viewed from the correct point both images are assembled into a three dimensional image within your visual cortex that defies understanding in its hyper level of reality. If aesthetic arrest was experienced before this, then cardiac arrest might be the next level experience in my gallery.<\/p>\n<p><strong>A.E.:<\/strong> Could you please elaborate a little about your 20-year project on the world\u2019s first 3D Artwork? Can we have a description and when is it going to be launched; where can one view it?<\/p>\n<p><strong>R.D.: <\/strong>The main visionary 3D installation was finished several years ago and sits in my gallery as a permanent work of art. What people think of when they first view it might be described as: \u2018Modern Contemporary work of art.\u2019 This 3D piece occupies an entire 10 x 10 foot gallery and stands nearly 7 feet tall. It is the result of half a lifetime of passion and hard work in the field of 3D. One person described it as a time machine. The techniques I developed specifically to create this installation will most likely never be equalled in my lifetime. It took 5 years of research and development just to design and hand build the stereo cameras to create this work. I call this Photo Impressionism, which is a special blend of a painting and a photograph together. It is truly unique and a marvel of binocular vision that does not require any mechanical aid except for one special mirror. Its pure art and technology brought together in a very creative and unusual way. This has been a vision of mine as I have always wanted normal people to see what the future of art might be and what an artist like me, who is afflicted with such passion, sees as he travels through space and time. I wanted to bring viewers of this work to a new and profound level of personal appreciation for what we have been given around us. My latest ventured into Lenticular science will next season bring the future into our lives today. On the wall of this installation are the following words:<\/p>\n<p>Please join me in celebrating human vision with this remarkable modern contemporary immersive 3D work of art. It has the power to make the most hardened soul smile, to uplift you no matter what the shoulder weight and will calm your soul in times of fear. It will raise your spirit and can heal a broken heart. It will energize your being while giving you strength to continue the path you have chosen. It has the power to make you see, not just look, and will tantalize your senses. You will voyage through inner space visually travelling to places unknown that have been ravaged by natures wrath of time. Your heart will beat as you guide your soul ship through worlds of hidden beauty always moving inward. You will realize your place of insignificance in this universe and will find consolation in knowing someone has created this wondrous place of beauty just for you. Too often we think and do not feel but here and now we both bow and kneel.<br \/>\n<!--nextpage--><\/p>\nngg_shortcode_1_placeholder\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>A.E.:<\/strong> You were working or had finished working on 3 Little Cherries when you had your epiphany. How did that piece, 3 Little Cherries, change your approach to your work?<\/p>\n<p><strong>R.D.:<\/strong> This work was influenced by the mezzotint from the genre of intaglio printmaking \u2013 more specifically, by the Japanese and, French artists like Mario Avani. What many do not realize is that a perfectly executed mezzotint naturally has very similar luminous qualities to what the illuminists pursued. This was achieved by a unique blend of black etchers ink on white paper in a rather pointillist manner caused by the use of a rocker. If coloured inks are added to this then the result can be quite stunning with respect to the manipulation of light. At the time, I was very influenced by this genre and Japanese artists such as Hamaguchi Yozo and Hamanishi Katsunori. I was attempting to develop a similar look but in a different genre, one that exploited more of the modern technologies we had at our fingertips. It was this direction that finally led to my current work and the moment where I actually experienced a mezzotint look and feel for the first time in the genre I use today.<\/p>\n<p><strong>A.E.:<\/strong> You discuss the importance of \u2018light,\u2019 the ability of a work of art to reflect light. Lighting is also important in poetry or in the best kinds of writing. In the latter instance we refer to that light as \u2018imagery\u2019 or more precisely, as \u2018synaesthesia.\u2019 Would you say an artwork can or should be a kind of visual poetry?<\/p>\n<p><strong>D.R.: <\/strong>I think that enlightenment through our imagination might be more appropriate for literature. What I mean is as we read about light in art or in poetry we imagine its effects on our body and mind. If I were to write a poem about the hot summer sun on my skin, then light in the more classic sense of the word comes into play at a psychological level. Luminous art has physical properties that act upon our being using tangible photons that travel through space as a form of energy. We digest the suns rays that give us vitamin D, which is another use of light at a physical level. The fact that light can have an alluring quality when mixed with colour is what gives my work a common theme of romanticism. I myself write poetry and prose about my art which can be read under many of my works on my website.<\/p>\n<p><strong>A.E.:<\/strong> Apart from its broad sense of light\/imagery in literature, more concretely synaesthesia is the description or apprehension of one sense by way of another one, which is not directly related to it. In C.S. Lewis\u2019 fantastic children novel, <em>The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe<\/em>, one of the four children protagonists, peter, is described as having a voice that is \u201cpale in the dark\u201d at a particular fearful moment. That sentence invokes a moment of aesthetic arrest, where more than one sensory organ is forcefully called to attention. Further, please consider that synaesthesia (more precisely described by some as \u2018ideasthesia\u2019) in its original Greek etymology, describes a involuntary fusing of cognitive and sensory processes leading to \u2018illusory\u2019 but well, \u2018real\u2019 \u2018neurological\u2019 perceptions. Some words induce certain colours in the viewer, or sounds or an object might result in an automatic recall of smells from childhood etc. Is this not the same thing the Illuminist\u2019s work invokes in the viewer \u2013 automatic spatial, visual, olfactory\u2026 etc neurological responses? In short, do the illuminist and the poet not share the ability to evoke multifarious sensations, which one can refer to as \u2018the sublime\u2019? This is \u2018aesthetic arrest,\u2019 is it not?<\/p>\n<p><strong>R.D.: <\/strong>Correct in all your assumptions. Any great literature, be it poetry or not has, the power to do this. This is what allows one novelist to be more successful than another. My wife pursues reading as a pastime as I do art, and she often tells me how certain writers can make her feel more than others just by their style of writing. So too it is in fine art. Our styles and technologies combine to give the viewer\/reader the impetus needed to fire the neurons within our mind that eventually, through cognitive interaction, allow \u2013 perhaps dopamine \u2013 to be injected at a physical level. I have experienced people so excited by the light in my work that they either start to cry or become angry. Anger is rare. I personally believe it has more to do with a negative response by a left\u00a0 brain dominant individual who by their very analytical nature need to understand the process as this is the only way they can truly appreciate the art. Because I refuse to explain my trade secrets, they suddenly loose control in the face of my work and gravitate to demanding how I do my work. I personally believe it is a response to being seduced by the light within the art, which causes a loss of emotional control which left hemisphere dominant people are not comfortable with at all. They realize perhaps for the very first time that the control they exert by the left analytical hemisphere over the right is not working in this illuminist environment. Their right hemisphere rises to a place of dominance and their left cerebral cortex feels threatened by something they cannot understand. These are my conclusions, of course, based on my in-gallery experiences and readings on the subject. I have dealt with many a personality and with many a different level of hemisphere-dominance in my time but one thing is definitely clear. Emotions are tied to light by any name and without it we have nothing.<\/p>\n<p><strong>A.E.: <\/strong>I was elaborate above and have asked what I did because you noted in your essay how it is important that a work of art should touch the soul. It is only the sublime that touches the soul. That is what good art of any kind, including poetry does. Could you elaborate on this kindly; this touching of the soul?<\/p>\n<p><strong>R.D.:<\/strong> So what is the soul? Well at a physiological level it might be described as two cerebral cortex hemispheres working together to achieve our maximum level of intellect at any given moment. Some may describe it as being something ethereal that cannot be described. Whatever the soul is, I believe it to be sensitive and compassionate towards nature, beauty and humanity. I believe that, in many it is lacking in nurturing and constantly looks for things to make it happy. I think those who love art are good souls in a world where the soul has been traded too often for monitory gain or power. This has more to do with ego I believe and as my son would argue, with narcissism. When I refer to light penetrating our soul, I am actually metaphorically talking about something as simple as happiness. I believe happiness is the only thing left worth pursuing in life. If you do not believe me try to be unhappy for a day. The light in my work makes people feel wonderful and happy, and by doing so it indirectly penetrates to the soul of that person. It feeds its need in a way that brings joy to those who have been searching for that but whom, through conventional means, have not found their own soul. Perhaps it is because of a poor relationship or a physiological disorder. Art, if it has the power to bring joy into ones life by what ever means, is transcending the conventional ways of achieving happiness by using the language of composition, shape, form and light to achieve something that has not so easily happened to these people before in a profound way. Almost everyone who enters my gallery will comment on the light but for those who need it most it has a profound and very emotional effect on them that somehow calms their soul.<\/p>\n<p><strong>A.E.:<\/strong> I have also noted, as a poet, that a lot of poets have no \u2018light\u2019 in their work, that is, the reader does not feel any \u2018aesthetic arrest.\u2019 In such instances such poets take refuge in the ironic expression \u2018prose poetry.\u2019 Do you read poetry at all; if so, what kind of poetry would you compare your art to \u2013 the lyric, the Ode, the Epic, and so on?<\/p>\n<p><strong>R.D.: <\/strong>Well I cannot say I am a poet or have read much in this genre but I can comment on this. In the past I have found that the only time my work felt complete was when I was able to articulate either a prose or a poem about my personal experience with the work. Case in point was the most painterly of my earlier years work, Late Winter Day. &#8220;Tall, willowed pines weigh heavy under newly fallen snow while fingered shadows stealthily crawl beneath their feet. Golden sunlit hues adorn each exposed branch while shyer boughs remain blue and hidden in shadow. I see light penetrating translucent green ferns that stand on a rolling blanket of soft powder, which shelters half buried deadwood on the right. A blue gray sky curtains the scene holding the composition together from all sides. I recall the hot sun on my skin as I turned towards the scene. The air was still and warm near sunset. Again, the golden hour was upon me so swiftly. Shadows grew longer by the second as I waited and waited for the light I needed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>A.E.:<\/strong> Please let us a little into your concept of the \u201cmechanical and intellectual\u201d component of your art.<\/p>\n<p><strong>D.R.: <\/strong>Mechanically, of course, we have what might be considered trade secrets to my work which most respect. If I ever refuse to discuses the analytical side of what I do it is because I do not want to ever destroy the illusion that my work offers the viewer. This coupled with the light can be interpreted in many ways \u2013 one of which I love to call, Magic. Often when I am asked bluntly, \u201cHOW DO YOU DO IT?,\u201d I reply with an answer and then a question. The answer is \u201cwith great effort\u201d and the question is, \u201cDo you know why a magician will never share his or her secrets? Its because the moment they do the magic will be gone for ever.\u201d Intellectually well I think the most profound aspect of me, as a person, is my awareness: awareness of everything. It has been written that a genius is a man who sees ten things when the ordinary man sees only one. I like to subscribe to the ingenious definition of my intellect as,\u00a0 \u201cIngenious, is the man who sees only two or three but has the ability to incorporate them into the material of his art.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>A.E.:<\/strong> There seems to be a studied intelligence, a theoretical precision, to the quiet genius of your work as an illuminist. What is that theoretical principle behind your work?<\/p>\n<p><strong>D.R.: <\/strong>This is getting into a very fundamental aspect of what I do outside of light. It is something I have been discussing with my son of recent. I have just finished my hearts desire which was to produce an entire B&amp;W engraved collection built on a previous and early developed technique called Acetate Engraving. Simply put long ago I was able to scratch into the surface of a piece of acetate and then fill it with ink that eventually, through the use of modern technology today, I managed to produce a wonderful\u00a0 engraved look and feel on paper. This final collection of 38 works is based on that beginning but has now incorporated something very profound into my work. It is perceived sharpness based on texture rather than actual sharpness of the image. In photography for example, it has always been known that the human psyche can perceive a higher-level of sharpness and detail simply based on the use of a granular texture being applied to the image. That is why many of the older photographs with their grainy finish are appreciated and are perceived as quite sharp. In actual fact the sharpness of the detail has more to do with the sharp grain than the sharp image. The eye always has something to resolve. The engraved line in this work has been used to replace much of any detail that might have been initially there. As a result the images are stunningly sharp and clear but I know that part of my complex process actually removed any sense of detail from the work before its completion. This is just one example of the \u201c theoretical precision\u201d that is at the heart of everything I do.<\/p>\n<p><strong>A.E.:<\/strong> Finally we will like to thank you very much, indeed. We appreciate you taking time from your very busy practice to talk to us. We wish you more creative breakthroughs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Illuminating our World, One Canvas at a Time (Amatoritsero Ede in conversation with Daniel Richards, Illuminist and Three Dimentionalist) &nbsp; Amatoritsero Ede: It is a real pleasure and an honour to have you with us on MTLS.\u00a0 The Illuminist, as an aesthete, is not a totally new figure in visual [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-326","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mtls.ca\/issue14\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/326","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mtls.ca\/issue14\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mtls.ca\/issue14\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mtls.ca\/issue14\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mtls.ca\/issue14\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=326"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.mtls.ca\/issue14\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/326\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":993,"href":"https:\/\/www.mtls.ca\/issue14\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/326\/revisions\/993"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mtls.ca\/issue14\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=326"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}